THE KABBALISTIC TREE
OF LIFE:
A MAP OF THE SOUL
Adam Blatner
Posted July 7, 2005
The kabbalistic tree
of life diagram (Hebrew name, "Etz Khayyim") was developed in the 10th
or 11th century, and figures in not only the Jewish mystical
tradition–from which it originally arose–, but also in the esoteric and
hermetic tradition of Western Europe since the early Renaissance.
Beginning in the 1960s, when there was a resurgence of interest in a
variety of alternative religions and types of spirituality–including
the mystical traditions within the mainstream religions–, there has
been an increasing number of books also about kabbalah and its related
forms. The western neo-pagan tradition, growing in part from the late
Rosicrucian, Masonic, and Anglo-European early 20th century
theosophical and occult traditions, also makes use of this tree of life
diagram, and it figures prominently in a number of modern "new age" and
Wiccan books, websites, and so forth. [For references, see
other paper on this website: References
on Kabbalistic Tree of Life]
I've found the
kabbalistic tree of life to be an especially powerful symbolic diagram,
portraying a number of archetypal principles and their relationships.
To be practically useful, the number of elements must be somewhat
limited–in this case, ten major elements and about twenty-two paths
among them (that number referring also, and not coincidentally, to the
twenty-two main letters of the Hebrew alphabet and also the twenty-two
special, non-numbered Tarot cards called the "major arcana").
Daring
to
Re-Think Meanings
A problem
with
all symbols, rituals, doctrines, books, and interpretations is that
they reflect the worldview and cultural associations of the time and
place of their creation. I confess to being what might seem like an
outrageous oxymoron, a postmodernist mystic, with an admixture of
mystical pragmatism, creative mythmaking, and perhaps other
appellations (Blatner, 2004).
In light of
developments in psychology, especially–and more specifically, sub-types
such as Jung's analytical psychology, transpersonal psychology, and
writings that compare and address the contemporary meanings of the
ancient psycho-spiritual traditions of South Asia–it is appropriate to
re-think these symbols, to consider what relevance and meaning they may
have to people living in our own era.
Thus, I confess
also that many of the interpretations which follow are my own, based on
a fair amount of reading and contemplation over 35 years, yet not tied
to what I've read. Thus, take these ideas as equal parts history,
philosophy, and poetry, as I've been willing to bring to the table my
own intuitions and inspirations, as well as re-presenting some basic
traditional concepts.
Indeed, the
purpose of all this is to offer a rough map that will stimulate your
own creative imagination, that you will adapt in your own way to the
challenges posed: How can you understand the meaning of life, given
that you are working through the lenses (and blinders) of
culturally-imposed worldviews? How can you make these meanings
relevant to your own personal situation? (I assure you, "there"
is no meaning–in terms of a formulation that could be expressed in a
phrase, a paper, a book, or a bookshelf full of books–that will work
for everyone at all times. No "out there," objective ultimate truths.
It's all a matter of your continuously creating your own mythology,
adapted to your own interests, temperament, background, abilities,
socio-cultural situation, and other individualized elements. This is
how I'm postmodernist.)
Functions
of a
Map
The
problem here
is that we're talking about a two-dimensional diagram that speaks to
what seems to be a three dimensional world progressing through a fourth
dimension of time, in an era of cosmological "string" theory that
posits seven other dimensions! Wow! This makes Plato's parable of
the cave both more relevant and yet oversimplified.
The world is
profoundly complex in so many ways–geographically, in terms of systems
theory or what a great contemporary philosopher, Ken Wilber, calls
"holonomically," and with an interpenetration of other dimensions of
(and beyond?) mind involving mathematics, music, imagery, and so forth.
Equally complex is the mind that perceives and co-creates the world,
and the best way to understand the tree of life is as a diagram of the
mind, including what has been called the "unconscious."
The unconscious
includes not only thoughts that are repressed, as Freud suggested, and
even thoughts or ideas that have not yet acquired enough coherence or
energy to enter awareness, as Jung noted, but there are yet more
fundamental dimensions. There are the structures or habits of thought
that are implied in the language process itself, and in the basic
instincts that enliven culture–what Jung called the archetypes–and even
more basically, the modes of thinking that come with the gifts and
limitations of the human nervous system and its development. As
we study subjects such as comparative culture, mythology, religion,
psychology, altered states of consciousness, art, and with input from
"imagineers" such as the writers of science fiction and fantasy, we
begin to glimpse at ways of thinking that stretch our imaginations
about what consciousness itself is about. Yet these are still modest
exercises in mind-opening compared with the reports of various swamis,
gurus, meditators, and other "psycho-nauts" who have plumbed the
frontiers of mind-worlds the ways that our nautical explorers probed
geographical frontiers four hundred years ago, or the astronauts of a
few centuries hence–in the spirit of Star Trek–seek to go where no
humans have gone before.
In deep
contemplation, Jewish mystics and Western esoteric practitioners
contemplated the depths of consciousness. The Western mystics mixed
these contemplations with comparable contemplations of alchemy–why do
certain substances act in certain ways–seeing the answers as hinting at
the nature of spiritual as well as material reality. Reality, to
them, involved both realms–their separation is a side-effect of the
overall cultural effort in the 18th through the 21st centuries to
become free of superstition and the irrational elements of traditional
religion. These "modern" thinkers threw out the figurative baby with
the bathwater, making the world purely materialistic and objective.
Interestingly, with the emergence of quantum physics, there has been a
re-statement of a worldview that saw the attitude of the thinker and
observer as playing a significant part of the idea of what is "really"
"there." (Or perhaps we can and should no longer so blithely
believe that linguistic structure that implies that there is a there
over there that is not what's happening over here, that here and there
are different. Stated by a sage over two thousand years ago in the
Indian Upanishads, "tat tvam asi," "thou art that." This is known as
the doctrine of non-dualism.)
With this as a
preamble, further ideas may become more clear by going back and forth
between a reference to the "hard data" (an ironic reference to the
diagram) and our own commentary. Thus, let's contemplate this diagram.
Figure 1.
|
This is the
form. It is intriguing for many reasons. I've written about how it can
reflect the roles we play in life, in our imaginations, in culture, and
the archetypes that enliven those roles. This paper complements that
published discussion, and goes further, in a variety of directions.
The
Chakras
Another
resonance with this diagram is its having a rough analogy with the
Hindu mystical and practical-psycho-spiritual and neo-physiological
system of kundalini Yoga. Humans are imagined to operate with seven
simultaneous centers of consciousness, reflecting their different types
of desire, the different scope of their awareness, correlates in their
physical bodies. Ingenious idea that really illuminates one of the
problems in modern 20th century psychology: Who was more right–Freud,
Jung, or Adler? Answer: They all were, each one speaking to the
psychology of a slightly different chakra! Others, also, can be
appreciated as having their focus more on one or certain combinations
of chakra consciousness.
The chakras,
incidentally, are generally portrayed as being associated with seven
levels of the spinal column, and these have rough associations to the
seven vertical positions on the tree. The tree, though, divides three
of those levels into two complementary spheres at levels 2-3, 4-5, and
7-8. We'll talk about what that added horizontal dimensionality adds to
the picture later.
Other
Correlations
There are
significant contemplations of the tree as a geometric design, in terms
of the numerological associations of each sphere, from one through
ten–considering the esoteric meaning of, say, "three-ness," and how it
differs from "four-ness." There are astrological correspondences that
can similarly be illuminating. These are discussed in an associated
paper (web-page), which you can access if you are interested.
We see this in
mathematics, and perhaps music: A fundamental idea can be expressed in
numbers, algebraic symbols, often in graphic form, and perhaps even
elaborated as a drawing that has a fair degree of aesthetic
interest. It is as if instead of the mythic idea of God having an
idea that is by will manifest fully and completely, the image is closer
to an act of improvisation. A general gesture may through a process of
continual refinement–and it can happen quite rapidly– emerge as a
movement in a dance, or in music, a jazz riff. Close inspection of the
gesture may reveal a series of steps of increasing elaboration or
variation–and that is what is reflected in the Tree of Life diagram. A
will toward becoming emerges into the field of mind as pre-form, deep
tendencies that reflect a dance of opposites, an elaboration into
greater degrees of complexity, and a gradual assumption of greater
specificity and clothing in material form and action. It can all unfold
in the time-breadth of a moment.
Z'ev ben Shimon
Halevi, a scholar of Western Kabbalah, has noted certain similarities
to a variety of systems:
Government
Economics
Time
1
. . (beyond)..
..beyond..
..beyond..
2
Spirit of nation
Concept of Exchange
planetary
3
Constitution
Principles of Finance
nature
4
Senate
Resources
and Capital
species
5
Representatives
Banking and Stock Exchange
one life
6
Congress
Unit of Money
Day/Night
7
Departments
Circulation and
Industry Breath
8
Civil Servants
Trade
Impression
9
People
Personal Assets, Wealth
Passing Time
10
Land
Possessions
Material World
It certainly
isn't required that you believe any of this, or even agree with it. The
above is presented just to suggest the sequence, the holonomy of the
systems, and how they include not just matter, or social organization,
but closer to the way systems operate in general.
Contemplating
"Upwards" and "Downwards"
Goodness,
there are so many aspects of this wonderful diagram, so many different
ways to look at it. Let's briefly note a major one: Beginning with
bringing more attention to everyday life, sphere number 10, at the
bottom of the diagram, practitioners of kabbalah meditate on
successively higher spheres: The explore the nature of imagination and
self-reflection, the ability to look at their lives, from sphere number
9, one step up. Then the go deeper, ever deeper, exploring mentally,
contemplating, meditating, letting the symbols speak through their
subconscious mind and into their awareness. They "rise" to "higher
levels of awareness." So the diagram is a map for deep contemplation.
Shulman's 2004 book is especially enlightening in this regard.
From the
opposite direction, the kabbalistic tree of life serves as a kind of
map of how existence is operating, just so folks can find some
orientation within the vast complexities of the cosmos. Are we just a
bundle of different anatomical components working together while we, as
organisms, crash our way through the brambled forest of the
world? The key word in such existential expressions of angst is
"just." But this map cuts through and cuts out the "just"-- we
become part of a glorious unfolding, both over the eons, the centuries,
the years and weeks and in the moment. And using this map, we remain
connected.
For example,
imagine that you are the god of your body's cells: If your cells needed
reassurance, a sort of mission statement, what could you tell them so
that they could keep their morale up, so that they just didn't let go
and fall apart into a big puddle of protoplasm? This is what William
Blake meant by saying that "If the sun should ever doubt, it would most
certainly go out." Now, imagine that you could show them this
map, and that you could (with divine inspiration) explain to them in
language that those little cells could understand, how what they're
doing is playing key roles in the maintenance of a cosmic organism! (To
ask them to go further and ask those little cells to realize that you,
in turn are also playing a role in the maintenance of an analogously
vaster cosmic organism may be too much even for their mind-expanded
little minds.)
Blessedly, our
cells contain more wisdom in this regard than we in our human
consciousness do–they know of the love of life, they feel the Life
Urge, they relish the nutrients and oxygen being given to them by the
grace of what to them seems an un-knowable super-organism. They play
their parts joyfully, loving us in return. Can we learn to do the same
for the great mythic (but in its own way, real) "organism" that we are
a part of? (Only recognize that with mind, we open to other
dimensions. This allows us to in fact be parts of many collectives,
many different organisms operating in different dimensions.)
Anyway, the tree
suggest the way that God unifies and also gives birth and re-birth,
every instant, through the lightning flash from 1 to 10, of successive
levels of becoming into what we experience as three-dimensional
space-time-matter-energy reality. And thus the tree operates as that
kind of icon–a sort of reminder of the big picture.
Even if we can't
understand it very well, it's nice to know that there are folks for
hundreds of years–and legend has it that many of these ideas trace back
thousands of years before that–who have contemplated and envisioned our
proper role in the cosmos, not based on revelation from the outside or
the past, but from deep contemplation into the depths of their reality.
And they all find essentially the same general underlying
pattern–that's what's so great about this diagram.
Aspects
of Divinity
Although
Judaism emphasizes the unity of God, it's obvious that there are
different aspects through which divinity may be expressed. There's the
"word of God," the Torah, which is studied as a source of revelation.
There is nature, and there is spirit, and the Old Testament speaks of
angels and archangels, seraphim and cherubim. The problem of the one
and the many is pervasive in philosophy, metaphysics, and so forth.
In Taoism, we
see the sign of the interacting Yin-Yang, and the recognition, in turn,
that this cosmic duality somehow expresses an underlying unity. There
is also a recognition of five elements and eight principles–again
expressing the idea that the one Divine operates in different realms.
Many religions
have many "gods," and have been condemned as polytheistic heathens,
ignorant of the great truth of the one God. Hinduism has been
especially condemned as flagrant in this regard, with thousands,
perhaps millions of deities being described, but it's partly a problem
of the ethnocentricity of European languages. First, Hindus recognize a
monotheistic reality, Brahman, but also recognize with greater insight
than those in the West, that there are qualitative differences that
require the expression of divinity to fit the situation–giving birth,
having sex, being romantically attracted–and that's not "just" sexual,
either–or rather, Sex as a greater principle is far more encompassing
than just the genital-orgasm-centered activity–, working, being a
warrior, and so forth. Their deities sort of are angels, but in the
West, angels aren't imagined to specialize that much; what if they did,
though, and what the Indians meant by small-g gods or deities are
analogous to an insight that different activities deserve
individualized angels that speak to that activity? A
mathematician's inspiring angel-muse might be different, very different
indeed, from a farmer's.
The Christian
religion recognizes that God's presence in the cosmos operates through
more than a single aspect of the father role. There is a "son" role or
function, and another, subtly different one, of "holy ghost," or "holy
spirit." Many books address the need for and subtle differences among
these. The Roman Catholic Church also recognizes the function of
saints, who again often specialize in certain domains of activity–at
least in the past–such as this saint for travelers, that one for
sailors, especially, this one for Frenchmen, that one for Englishmen.
The Muslims have
a tradition of having ninety-nine names of God, again expressing the
sensibility that it is fitting to appreciate the many ways that
divinity acts in the world, and in the soul of individuals.
So, those within
the seemingly monotheistic tradition of Judaism who contemplate deeply
are able to appreciate the idea that it is fitting that there might be
many types, levels of divine expression in the cosmos, and the ten
spheres thus represent ten of these. Esoteric scholars have traced this
number, by the way, to Jewish scholars who have counted ten different
names for God in the Old Testament. Sometimes He's called "elohim,"
sometimes (in common English translation) "Jehova," and sometimes
"Adonai," Lord–plus other names. Since everything in the Torah has
meaning, there must have been meaning in these inconsistencies–and this
was the approach, long before there was any tradition of
historical-textual criticism. What if the different terms were alluding
at a deep level to different aspects?
In a more
contemporary view, it is useful to allow this concept of "aspects" or
"domains" to enrich our concept of divinity. It breaks down the
patriarchial image of father or king, for one thing, inviting us to
look into the depths of certain processes, to wonder about such realms
of being as the "archetypes," for example. Jung believed that they were
more than just expressions of the personal psychology of individuals,
that they were "psych-oid," meaning that they were like mind, but
possibly having qualities that went beyond what we could know or
describe about human minds. He suggested that they might have a
kind of existence apart from the mind of the person experiencing
them–which made them a bit more like the Greek gods and muses.
Polytheistic
approaches have also had their contemporary advocates, seeking to break
down the mind–numbing habit-ness of thinking of God, indivisible.
What if God just loves to be divided, loves to divide into an infinity
of new ways, at an infinity of different levels and sub-types? What if
God loves to be appreciated at both her in-divisible level or nature
and also as expressing herself through humming-bird-ness, and
breathing-ness, and typing on a computer-keyboard-ness?
Levels
of Energy
Here's
another way of thinking: One of the realities brought to our attention
through science in the last several centuries is the awareness of
different levels of energy existing in the cosmos. The sun is billions
of times more energetic than the most energetic things on
earth–earthquakes, for example–and they in turn are more energetic than
volcanoes, and hurricanes, and tsunamis, which are more energetic than
hydrogen bombs, and so on down the line. The electricity coming out of
the turbines at a great hydroelectric dam may be at, say, hundreds of
thousands of volts, and these are then reduced at a series
transformers, distributed more widely, diluted, if you will, so that
what comes through your home sockets doesn't blow out your little
machines or burn down your house. What if essential
spiritual energy similarly needed to be reduced in stages so that the
God of the Universe was also expressed as the Cherub of the Galaxy, the
Seraph of the galactic sector, the archangel of the solar system, the
sub-archangel of the planet earth, and then a whole series of regional
and sub-regional angels–all of whom were God, as much as you are your
organs, tissues, cells, and cell components, and finally your atoms.
What if human
minds couldn't handle the vastness and depth of consciousness of the
greater beings–it would figuratively short out, fry, sizzle? What if it
is a natural act of grace, charity, and limitation that we can only
perceive and cogitate on just maybe one or two or three–but not
ten–levels beyond our own?
Humility
What if
we can't begin to know the whole picture, and we couldn't manage it if
we did glimpse even a moderately big picture. Do we really need to
satisfy the illusion that if we knew we could manage our lives
better? Who said that, and why should we think it's true?
Perhaps it's enough to just stretch and enlighten a little bit, to the
next step or two of the evolution of our humanity. That itself should
be very satisfying, and it's not at all clear that we're going to do
this.
Thus, this map
need not pretend to be a final answer, nor even one that would be
useful to a being from another planet. It expresses to some degree a
function as a guide and source of inspiration and ideas for our
lives–that is enough. More, it is as useful as you can use it. For
many, it's not even interesting. For others, not their vocabulary, not
their channel. So this diagram may be more like a type or even piece of
music. Still, if it clicks, then it's a useful tool for furthering your
imaginative, psychological, and spiritual growth.
Hebrew
Names, Rough Translations
Traditionally,
the kabbalistic tree of life is an expression of ten spheres of divine
activity, or one might say, aspects of divinity. The term for the
spheres is "sefirot," (singular = sefira). Sphere is not the official
translation, but as it has come to refer to the name of a general
category, as in the phrase, "sphere of influence," it has moved
linguistically beyond its technical meaning as a geometric figure.
My translations
reflect an attempt to express the underlying idea in light of
contemporary thinking. We must realize more vividly that our present
intellectual climate has been profoundly influenced by developments in
psychology, the impact of new media and the shifts in thinking that
brings about new metaphors, all require a shift also in general
worldview. We know about distances, galaxies, atoms and sub-atomic
particles, mechanisms of the human body's function, and a million other
things that weren't known to the folks two or three hundred years ago.
Divine
Categories
One
reason we might find the Tree a more accessible symbol is that we now
have in the mainstream of culture a greater familiarity with the
concept of categories, the idea that there can be underlying dynamics
and patterns that are not always directly ascertainable by quick visual
inspection.
In the realm of
biology, and human function, only in the last two hundred years have we
been able to elucidate the many levels of human physiology and
microscopic anatomy. In the realms of chemistry and physics, similarly,
increasingly subtle patterns of interaction have been revealed, which
then generate the conceptual structures of atoms, sub-atomic particles,
and their dynamic forces. Even within mathematics there have been
shifts that reveal the sets of assumptions that generate our most
familiar patterns, and in so doing, suggest alternative possibilities
that then open our minds to new perceptions, in the realms of imaginary
numbers, dimensionality, fractals and chaos theory, topology, and so
forth. The point here is that there is a growing awareness of a kind of
"systems" theory, of actual recognition of dynamics and structures that
are not always fully material, yet operate within a hierarchy of
inclusive structures. The contemporary philosopher, Ken Wilber, notes
these hierarchies even in the realms of individual consciousness and
interpersonal and social arrangements.
Kabbalah might
then be understood as a similar progression. I see this as sets or
categories of phenomena, progressively more abstract, beginning with
the 10th sefira at the bottom of the Tree– the most material and
manifest phenomena, and moving "upward" or "inward" to illuminate the
living contexts that underlie the outward modality.
The first jump,
upward on the tree to the 9th sefira, is to the sphere of imagination,
which, if you think about it, is far vaster than what can be actually
realized. For example, while a person might be able to live a number of
roles, constrained by certain realistic demands–and thus not be able to
fly like Superman–, that person can indeed imagine himself flying.
People experience far more alternatives, "what if..." possibilities,
"roads not chosen," than what they actually end up living out.
This 9th sphere
is made possible through the complexities of the mind to reflect and
consider alternative possibilities, to make associations that include
intuition and inspiration as well as rational thought–and even to enjoy
imagining that which is not rationally possible. Less well developed in
animals or plants, the 9th sphere operates in a more rudimentary
fashion, carrying the instincts.
Aristotle's
Four Causes
The
ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle, astutely challenged the
oversimplified term, "cause," noting four different ways that events
are influenced.
– The
"material" cause refers to the kinds of actual physical materials that
must be available for the event to proceed. This is the bricks, mortar,
timbers, and other things needed to build a house.
– The
"efficient" cause refers to the non-material energy needed to
accomplish some task. Admittedly, it may be channeled by a material
tractor, or at a higher level, through the diesel oil that drives its
engines, but–and here, too, there are increasing levels of subtlety–it
involves the higher states of potential energy that are liberated when
hydro-carbons are burned with oxygen.
It deals more
with ideas like "agent" or "force."
– The
"formal" cause refers to the "information" in the system, the map or
blueprint, the description of how the process works. It deals more with
ideas like "mechanism."
– The
"final" cause refers to the purpose, the anticipated outcome of the
activity.
So when someone
asks "why" something is so, or how it works, a measure of dialog is
needed to clarify which aspect of causality is not apparent. It may be
that, in asking "why?," she's asking "what is the purpose of doing
this?" or, sensing and perhaps agreeing with the purpose, she may be
asking, "what's the mechanism that's driving this?" or "what is the
source of the drive to do this? Who wants it?"
Applied to the
Kabbalistic Tree of Life, these elements operate in a not-so-distinct
fashion. The 10th sefira is closer to the material cause, though it
must be imagined to some degree in the 9th and 8th sefirot, also. The
efficient cause may be more noticeable in the 7th sefira, but has roots
in the 4th and 2nd. The formal cause is distributed through
factors or dynamics operating at all levels, while the final cause, the
purpose, has its major roots again in 7th, 4th, and 2nd. At another
level, the 6th sefira also has its own purpose, which is to balance and
harmonize the other purposes.
Practical
Implications
Let's
just pick a simple grouping for starters:
1.
Recognize the source, and intuit into the unity of all existence. The
idea that we can win at the expense of them is, in the long term,
illusory. We're all in this together. Ecology. An expanded sense of
identity. Also, this source points to the great mystery of creation,
and what lies beyond our knowledge.
2.
Celebrate creativity. It's a mythically grounded idea. There's a
tradition in many religions to imitate God, however the Divine is
imagined: The most useful way to do this in our own time is to
recognize the prolific process of creativity–not just through the "Big
Bang," but in the present moment, through the imaginations and
inspirations–literally, in- spirit- ations – of all sentient beings.
Corollary: Question authority. Accept nothing as the final solution.
Dare to re-evaluate, revise, re-negotiate, imagine new possibilities.
Obedience, in this view of the meaning of the Kabbalistic Tree of Life,
is no longer operative–there's a move from the medieval tone of
unquestioning acceptance to the modern and postmodern worldview that
supports responsibility, an alert consideration of the needs of the
moment in light of continuing developments, discoveries, new
technologies, etc.
3.
Recognize the Other-ness of people, their differences, of the
environment, and of the Divine. On one hand, we may be expressions of
the Divine flow, and at some level, as claimed by Yogis and other
mystics, "one" with It, yet that doesn't mean that the world is there
for the gratification of your ego-narcissistic desires. Respect,
reverence, humility, and a valuing of the needs of others and the whole
all are implied here.
4.
Cultivate Generosity and Purpose. The life force is innately generous,
but in states of fear, can contract to mere life-sustenance. In today's
complex culture, there are tendencies towards stinginess of spirit, and
this must be balanced, in wisdom, by the joy and need for an extra bit
of giving of oneself to the world. Seek to clarify your talents and
abilities and turn them toward this task, at least to some significant
degree, lest you die having lived selfishly, pettily.
5.
Realize Limitations. Much of human life is a process of
dis-illusionment, which is a process of dissolving childish feelings of
omnipotence. This need not be tragic. Much of it is simply adjusting to
the realities of physical and social constraints, learning to think and
work politically, seeking a more refined and less impetuous mode of
action in the world. It's a one-step-down form of humility, more
practically applied.
Realize, also,
that as shown in the diagram of the Tree, the lessons play off of each
other, and especially there is the ongoing play of 2 and 3, 4 and 5,
and 7 and 8, while 6 is to some degree, the player, the juggler, the
dancer.
6.
Exercise Balance, seek to harmonize the many different needs, desires,
inspirations, ideals, and other complexes that seek expression through
your own mixture of temperament and interests. One of the beauties of
our time-bound lives is that we can choose how to diversify, focus,
take turns, and thus have some existential responsibility for how we
live our lives.
7.
Identify your passions, what the comparative mythologist Joseph
Campbell called, "following your bliss." What tickles your fancy?
Instead of pursuing what is merely fashionable, liking or disliking
largely to garner approval or to be included in the "in group"–which is
an in-authentic reason–, get in touch with what more genuinely
interests or appeals to you. This can take many years, even into late
adulthood. Often you'll find it correlates with what you have at
least some moderate ability to do. Have the courage to pursue it. (And
this can be tremendously varied in the world, different folks liking
different strokes.)
8.
Recognize and work within the cultural matrix you live in. If not, then
either be a smart revolutionary–to change or expand it–or pay the price
of changing cultures, emigrating, and becoming acculturated into a
different culture. Lots of people do this, too. The point is to deal
responsibly with the social context you find yourself in, rather than
simply sulking, withdrawing, giving up, mindlessly conforming, or
numbing yourself.
9.
Cultivate Imagination, in many ways–the arts, drama, mythmaking. Note
that much of ordinary education and life neglects, distracts, and
sometimes actively suppresses this human potential. Refuse to be
tempted by vicarious imaginary experiences offered by the media, in
video games, television, movies, etc. Take responsibility to use those
elements like small stimuli, like appetizers or dessert, but not your
main meal. Become a person who imagines your own life!
10.
Manifest your life. Avoid the temptations to become preoccupied with
the seductions of spectatorship, or living in "what if" (either in past
or future). Deeds, projects, action. The world is no illusion. You have
an opportunity for authentic enjoyment, for adding your own creativity
to helping the world be a better place. In can be in as small a way as
an act of kindness or generosity.
Lest these
points seem like mere platitudes, rather obvious, consider that many if
not most people do not live these principles out in their lives. Nor
are these ten points the only lessons you can gather from studying the
tree. They just show what can come to mind–that the principles noted
are by no means mere abstractions.
Another way to
view the tree is in terms of how it can reassure and remind you: That
you are part of a great, unified "becoming" of the cosmos (1); that
this is a creative process and your life creativity is an integral part
of the great becoming (2); that the cosmos is here, a matrix (related
to the Latin word root for mother) for you, a setting, playground,
stage, for you (3); that you can choose a direction, many directions,
in fact, and your choices add to your story–and indeed, you may be
assured that your life is a story (4); part of that story involves the
way you've coped with limitations–your body's structure,
illnesses, dis-abilities, areas of no-talent, the weakness and
deficiencies of your family, region, and historical era, and the many
other obstacles that life presents–and indeed, that which makes your
story a good piece of drama! (5); the creative way you've balanced your
strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and limitations, etc.(6); the
many lines of interest and ability, the archetypes, the mythic
resonances with the spirit of (whatever dimension you channel)–all set
you into stage in which you play many parts in a unique fashion (7);
the cultural forms all this enactment takes, and how you are a carrier
of certain cultural values, and a challenge to others that you don't
agree with–these, too, make your life good theatre and also part of the
great unfolding myth of that culture!(8); the richness of your
imagination as you assemble these many threads into a meaningful story,
embellishing it also with all the other what-if-dramas you can
fantasize, thickening your existence (9); and, finally, how you
actually play out your unique life, your actual achievements, your
deeds. You might be surprised how far many of your actions have reached
(10).
The point of
this rhapsody is to enjoy the depth of your mythic embeddedness in the
Divine Process of Unfolding. This is the way God works, through your
individuality (and everyone else's, also, of course)! Envision it
as an infinite symphony, improvised, incredibly rich, which, if
perceived from enough distance and time, expresses amazing harmonies
(in spite of a surprising amount of what in the moment may seem like
mere noise, or as Shakespeare called it, "sound and fury." On a
micro-scale, it may "signify nothing," but in the big picture, this is
how we all grow, evolve as a species, groping, going up blind alleys,
turning back, trying another way.
Conclusion
The
relevance and value of the Tree of Life as a useful symbol is that it
provides a mythic grounding, offering a rich set of associations to a
wide range of phenomena and traditions. You can see more vividly how
your physical life is an expression of your imaginative life, and how
your mind is vaster than what can actually be played out. Still, as an
artist, you do what you can.
Because of the
Tree of Life, you can glimpse at how your life is an expression of your
culture, even if in a number of ways you seek to revise and refine that
culture. You see, through deeper contemplation, that your life is also
a nexus, a point of convergence of a number of instinctual desires:
Security
Achievement Status
Virtue
Sex Parenting
Skill mastery in vocation and avocation
Advocate of causes Fan of Artists
Appreciator of Nature Cultivator of House or
Garden Advancer of Causes
Student of Life Student of
Philosophy Seeker
... and so forth
You begin to
realize that you not only channel, more or less, these different
dimensions of beings–the Graeco-Roman view might be that you live out
the spirit of the various gods–, but more, you have learned--again,
more or less–to balance, focus, diversify, and find ways to do this in
socio-culturally constructive ways. This is the challenge of the higher
archetype of the harmonizer, the juggler, the magus.
With deeper
contemplation, you become aware of several other levels of Divine
manifestation, pouring through the uniqueness that is you, and
celebrating that individuality: The currents of Yin and Yang, of
Jupiter and Saturn, of primal dualities, all expressing the paradoxical
nature of The One, the Life Force at many levels of becoming. Your
being is indeed wonder-filled, filled with these underlying patterns,
forces, purposes.
Some use this
map to find their way "back" to their identification with the One, the
Source, and to rediscover the bliss of non-dual awareness. (This is a
major path of Yoga and to some degree, of Buddhism). Others use this
map as a guide for a richer grounding for doing the work, of helping
the Cosmos be re-born in ever-new ways, reaching for Value. (And some
may find this entire exercise irrelevant. Well, there are myriad paths
towards wisdom, and if this essay acts as a catalyst to some, that is
enough.)
Please feel free
to email me and tell me how you'd add to this, suggest cross-links to
your website or weblog, make comments, etc. If they're interesting to
me, I may (with your permission) post them, perhaps with my comments,
on a related webpage.
Related
Webpages:
1. References on Kabbalah and
especially, The Tree of Life diagram
2. Further Correlations and Contemplations: Geometry, Numerology,
Astrology, etc.
3. Drawings.
4. Related papers by me on this website:
Blatner, A.
(2004). Creative mythmaking. Retrieved from website:
Http://www.blatner.com/adam/ ....
Return to Top