The Lore of Scriptology: Lecture 6a:
Summary & Reflections (Part 2)
AdamBlatner, M.D.
Posted 03/08/01 Given as part of Senior
University
Georgetown's February - March, 2011 program.
1. Introduction
2. The
Early History of Writing
3. Mid-History of Writing
4. Elaborations
and Related Developments
5: Invented
Alphabets
6. Codes and Play with Alphabets 6a This is the Summary
The
main point I want to make is that writing is a tool, an invention that
transcends any particular field---truly inter-disciplinary. Gelb called
this "Grammatology" but a postmodernist philosopher, Jacques Derrida,
has also used that term for a very different idea. I prefer the term I
made up, "scriptology." This recognizes that writing involves art,
self-expression, history, politics, as well as mere linguistics.
(Interestingly, many books on linguistics don't even include a
consideration of writing.)
I
think it's also an important element in psychology, especially a
psychology that attends to world-view, the influence of culture,
historical trends, and such. Writing is part of the process of
externalization---of expressing the ideas inside the mind---where
things can get muddled and confused and vague---out into the world.
Talking is one way, and drawing rough maps about things, or diagrams is
another. Writing captures a more finely-detailed record of thoughts or
speech. It preserves it so others not present can read it, people at a
distance, and people at a later time. As I noted in the first lecture,
writing is the only invention since the evolution of DNA that stores
and replicates information!
We live in a time when consciousness has evolved enough so that it
begins to examine itself. It looks at the way we think, our
susceptibility to illusion, our tendency to become caught up in
believing our illusions as "true" and forgetting that whatever models
we may have of reality, that they are always, always preliminary,
provisional. There are always new inventions, discoveries, trends in
thought and world-view, so that whatever we believed as true back then
may not apply, be as useful, cover as much territory in the present.
Meta-Cognition
This is a fancy term for thinking about not only what we think about,
but also the way we think about it. This applies also to
communications, and involves such related aspects as:
- semantics, the study of how words mean---especially emotionally---,
- rhetoric, the art of persuasion, wich is related to propaganda analysis and the study of logical fallacies
- numeracy, appreciating how numbers can be used to help or
hinder clear thinking, also related to how to lie with statistics
- illusion-ology, not just optical illusions, or auditory or
taste or other perceptual illusions, and more than the use of illusions
in stage magic, also the many ways the mind generates illusions in
thinking about self, spiritual issues, mysteries as yet unsolved,
over-estimating one's abilities, and so forth...
- fundamental assumptions in philosophy, about metaphysics (what
is real), epistemology (how do we know what we know), etc.
- law, justice, politics, how we decide together on the rules,
and how we forget that it is we who can and should be re-deciding,
abdicating our responsibility to those in the past or some
heaven-originated code
- culture, custom, social traditions, standards of status, what
we take for granted as "common sense"---many ideas of which are being
contested in recent years
- and the power of media to numb
thought, to take on authority that it doesn't merit, the tendency to
idealize or believe that if it's in a book it must be so
I confess that this general theme is close to my special interest. As a
retired psychiatrist, I've been impressed with the pervasiveness
of the tendency to hold on to assumptions from childhood or one's
sub-culture, many of which are obsolete or too narrow in scope. These
retained beliefs are often a major source of inner conflict and
dis-ease. I write about this elsewhere on my website and blog.
A
related problem is that people tend to believe that important
thoughts have already been thought, which feeds their sense of security
and also supports their mental inertia (i.e., laziness). Why should I
have to participate in negotiating or creating new rules for my life
if others wiser than me have already figured it out? On one hand, this
is the gift of culture, to rely somewhat on the foundations or
inventions developed by others. On the other hand, to unthinkingly
accept that what others have created are the best and final solutions
to a problem is to idealize those who have gone before. Idealization is
the mentally lazy activity of overgeneralization---if they have done
some things well, then everything they do is great. Whoa, there. People
sometimes do some things well and other things not so well. We're mixed
in our abilities. Furthermore, what was great a hundred years ago
probably doesn't make use of the technologies or discoveries that have
emerged since then, nor are the inventions of the past geared well to
the needs of the present. (This means also that what is discovered
today may not be perfectly applicable in five years, so the message
here is to support an attitude that's open to ongoing creativity and
revision.)
To depend overmuch on the creativity of the past, or the authority of
those who have gone before may also be a transference---we are inclined
to apply what we had to think as young
children about our parents (because we were relatively helpless and
clueless compared to them and who else could we trust?) to situations
today, and to the ability and integrity of today's
authorities---politicians, clergy,
educators, etc. The trouble is that half the time they have
demonstrated repeatedly that they do not merit this level of
trust! As a doubly-board certified hunky-do psychiatrist, an
authority, I can say with authority that there's so much we don't
know that you should not take what I say or we say as if it's so! Check
it out for yourself. Even Siddartha Guatama, the Buddha, said something
like this. (I am trying to encourage an attitude that values creativity
and
curiosity, and hope my writings will provide tools that make the use of
these attitudes more effective.) So, back to writing.
The purpose of this class is to bring explicit awareness to the
hypnotic power of the media. Marshall McLuhan wrote about this problem
in the mid-late 1960s, and others have since. It is in the interests of
the mass media moguls to suppress this awareness. Rhetoric is the art
of persuasion, and it applies especially to advertising and
politics---although it's pervasive in almost all human interactions.
How do I get you to agree with me? But critical thinking is the
counter: How do I know that what you're trying to persuade me to buy or
vote for is actually good? It might not be. This is a vast
socio-cultural dynamic, and how media is used becomes one of its tools.
Does a given idea seem more true if you see it in print than in
handwriting (cursive)? Is it more true if it's on the internet or
television? Can books with editors lie to you? (Evidence is
accumulating that, alas, media is not to be trusted: In addition
to outright lies, various books and television programs are laced with
half-truths that seem like whole truths, people manipulating statistics
to adjust the impression they give, and the widespread use of logical
fallacies that offer the appearance of "truthiness.")
The study of writing thus offers a perspective that gets above writing
and asks overarching questions. Another function scriptology has is
that by recognizing the medium more explicitly, you are empowered to
play with it, stretch it, explore it. Some poets do this by changing
certain standards, so that, for example, e.e. cummings in the mid-20th
century didn't capitalize either his own name or words. The point
is that for different purposes, it might be reasonable to alter the
conventional standards for the medium, change the size, color,
arrangement, font, and so forth.
The Inter-Disciplinary Nature of Scriptology
The emphasis of this lecture series and the point of the term
"scriptology" is to lift the subject beyond the association of this
technology with any particular discipline. Computer science has evolved
beyond the design of faster calculators to invite our contemplation of
these machines as toys, aids to relationship, companions in themselves,
vehicles for self-expressive art, broadcasting, and innumerable other
socio-cultural functions. Scriptology should be viewed similarly as a
trans-disciplinary field, like ecology, inter-spirituality, and so
forth. (I advocate also that we recognize that psychology transcends
the individual and should include not just neuro-physiology and somatic
psychology, and of course intra-psychic dynamics, but also the fields
of interpersonal, small group, microsociological, general sytems,
socio-cultural, and even anthropological-archetypal dimensions of our
beings. In some circumstances, who we "really" are may be more as
members of larger collectives than as separate individuals, and it's
important that we realize that. Sometimes we are a lone individual
speaking truth to power, but often our existence and power only
manifests as part of a unified movement or sub-group. Different
situations, different identities.
Scriptology is also something we should rise above and begin to use,
lest the media 'use' us. There's a saying: The flying fish knows more
about the water than the herring. This means that those who can leave
the medium and enter another, contrasting, medium (i.e., air), can
begin to notice the difference (i.e., water has a quality known as
"wet-ness"). So, too, by reflecting on that which tends to become
habitual, we rise above it and can begin to take its qualities into
account. It exerts less of a subtle hypnotic power over us.
Future Speculations: What's Next in Consciousness Evolution
I can't say yet what it will be, but it will be stuff we take for
granted enough that we teach our kids about it and model doing it in
our lives. One possibility will be the art of self-hypnosis, that we
use to heal our wounds, quiet ourselves, relax ourselves, combat
stress, center, open to inspiration, and empathize more compassionately
with others. I forsee a time when this will be a group of skills we
teach in pre-school and the first few years of regular school, like
reading and writing, and that such skills become a norm. Or perhaps it
will be something else. The point is that the shift from an oral
culture to a written culture reveals the potential for humans to absorb
a wider range of abilities and to participate more in the evolution of
our own consciousness.
Other Dimensions of Scriptology
Web pages can be more interactive than one-way. You can respond to
these words and email me at adam@blatner.com and suggest new points, or
correct some of my misconceptions. There can be more back-and-forth. If
you send me ideas, let me know if you'd like me to use your name and/or
email address in what I edit and incorporate. I may not use what you
send me, but I might. I am quite open to learning new things or
changing my mind---it's more interesting than wallowing in the illusion
of "being right."
Much of the history of writing can be found under the general topic of
linguistics---either 411 in the Dewey Decimal System or P211 in the
University System. (Interestingly, many books on linguistics don't
address writing per se at all!). Decipherment in archeology, of course,
and ancient history---these are also obvious sub-topics. Issues that
have to do with local writing systems have a fair amount to do with
cultural identity, local politics, and regional history. But many
aspects of scriptology also overlap with book design Z-40, printing,
graphic design, graphology (as a form of psychological analysis), art,
computer science, media studies, typography, calligraphy (in the fields
of art), advertising, semiotics (the impact of images on feelings),
propaganda analysis, penmanship, spelling reform, cartooning, poetry,
cryptanalysis (codes), education (what is the best way to help kids
learn), rehabilitation from brain injury or stroke, special education
(for the various sub-types of special reading disabilities or
dyslexia), and so forth.
There are also the related fields of librarianship, the creation of
writing-related books---dictionaries, encycolpedia, thesauruses, books
of lists, and so forth. Other media use scripts---i.e., movies, radio
shows---even if only to set the tone and offer some structure within
which varying degrees of improvisation may occur. There are whole
industries devoted to supporting the writing and printing of books or
magazine articles, dealing with illustration, graphic design,
composition, style for various purposes (science, academic, popular,
etc.), the invention of more useful writing surfaces, new types of
paper, printers, copiers, LCD and computer screens, inks, pens,
brushes, projectors, PowerPoint and other organizing systems, and the
list goes on. Not that this complex is unique: Other complexes deal
with food preparation and delivery, transportation, parenting aids,
military weaponry, and many other endeavors. The point is that the
pilot of an airplane may be what we pretended to be as a kid, but it
turns out that the pilot is only a tiny element in the actual adult
enterprise of air travel; so, too, the actual printed words on the page
is only one element in a great complex of supporting components in the
process of mass communication. Still, it's good to not over-estimate or
under-estimate the power of these marks and the implications of their
function in our lives.
Considering Literacy
A century ago large numbers of people were comfortably illiterate: They
really didn't need to know reading and writing to get by with their
lives. Not long after that writing became such an important part of
farming and technology, banking and money management, that becoming
literate became a relatively important skill set. I think that in the
early 21st century, learning how to look at your own mind and its
tendencies to slip into illusion and foolishness will become equally
important for coping with a culture characterized by nothing so much as
change itself. I call this "psychological literacy."
Nevertheless, part of true wisdom involves not only knowing about your
own mind and its pitfalls, but also about the culture---and part of
that involves the development of ways to cultivate critical thinking
(also known as sharpening your bulls**t detectors), so as to recognize
when you're being manipulated, and to know how to counter it. The world
is full of scam artists who prey on your gullibility, your inclination
to buy into their latest money-making schemes. What if some major
political leaders and ideologies might merit the same critical analysis
as the spam and scam artists who infest your email?
(By the way, one of the major ways Euro-American politicians "stole"
the land from the Native American Indians is that they first used
"trade treaties" that had little legal twists and turns in them---the
manipulation of the non-literate by the literate---and then used
loopholes to justify the use of violence to back up otherwise specious
claims. So the interface of a culture of writing with a culture that
doesn't have that technology can be historically significant and
oppressive. What if spin doctors are being used by big corporations and
lobbyists who have politicians in their pockets to convince you that
what they're doing is raping you softly while making you think that
they're your friends? (They know how not only use writing, but
rhetoric, and they don't teach that hardly enough to kids. What if they
made a great unit in middle school and high school about how "they" are
trying to scam and rip you off---and use that motivation that captures
and sublimates teen rebelliousness so that they become truly indignant
and participatory citizens?)
Indeed, literacy is becoming diluted because the use of television and
video makes it possible to go through increasingly vibrant periods of
time with the illusion of being alive and engaged while in fact one is
simply significantly hypnotized---or was that the thesis of Matrix and
other science fiction movies?)
Final Comments
Play can be fun, and it is also subversive---in that when you
break out of the box, go beyond the envelope, explore the larger
picture, you might find not only enjoyable new horizons, but an
awareness that you and the others had been "in" a box! When you play,
you experiment with the edges of stuff, and thereby become more free. I
hope this class has been enjoyable and has stimulated you to learn more
about this field.
A bibliography of scriptology may be found elsewhere on this website. I welcome your input.
Email to adam@blatner.com