CONTEMPLATING THE TREE OF LIFE
Adam Blatner
March, 2013 (Based on a presentation to the special interest group
for spiritual exploration in my Sun City community (Georgetown,
just north of Austin, Texas).
Other papers such as
The
Kabbalistic Tree of Life: A Map of the Soul, and
references. are elsewhere
on this website. Google Blatner, Tree of Life
The following
theological speculation works as a contemplation of mind and
existence as based on the map or diagram called the Kabbalistic
Tree of Life, in Hebrew, the Etz Khayyim. In my mind it’s a
neo-platonic model, implying that the “more-yet” of each higher
realm of creativity is superseded by a further more-yet of another
higher realm—and it quickly becomes increasingly difficult for
even the most subtle human mind to grasp. But I think we can
barely touch into or speculate upon the higher more-yets of what
it’s all about!
Start With Our Material World at the Bottom
It begins with a wallowing in wonder at what is! We continue to
discover yet further horizons in many directions of all possible
variations in rock and geological processes, in transformations
over time and involving life forms, extinctions, evolutionary
processes. There are in this realm innumerable discoveries yet to
be made, innumerable forms of music yet to be composed, dances to
be danced, and other possibilities for humanity. Certainly we have
not made much progress in creating a truly sustainable and loving
world.
Going "Higher" (or Might We Say, "Deeper"?)
But it helps me to know that my dreams, fantasies, visions, hopes,
and other extensions of mind are also part of this. Indeed, they
give birth to whatever humans can create. Their parallel in oher
dimensions are all the unspoken triggers for all instinctual
reactions of all animals and plants. So on a level beyond the
material expression of the All is the psychic field that gives
birth to the material, the hopes and plans, creative ideas—only
some of which have any practical potential. But finding these is
the game to play. This takes the concept of the unconscious and
pre-conscious out beyond the realm of the individual or the group
and suggests that Divinity manifests as a vast field of potentials
out of which material possibilities form, and others may yet
form, and others again may never find expression.
That such a field exists is a mythic invitation to inspiration and
creativity, the realm of dreams that invites us to learn to become
more conscious of our dreams, to travel some day and harvest even
more of the potential here, just as in the last few millennia
we’ve learned to mine and refine more potentials in the realm of
minerals.
The Archetypal Images
But there’s more yet. That is another pull of the contemplation of
Divinity! Whence comes this vast field of images and interests,
talents and temperaments? There is a deeper field that is as vast
in relation to the aforementioned psychic field as that psychic
field is vast in relation to the field of what becomes manifested
in concrete form in our lives.
Our fabulous minds in their most awakened state partake of only a
tiny fraction of what all humanity processes—all the different
cultures, subcultures, vocations and occupations, games and
amusements, types of dress and types of relationships among the
parties. Even in our most sophisticated, world-traveled mode, a
single human partakes—can partake—of only a relatively limited and
minute fraction of the human potential. Most people’s worlds of
relevance involve quite different elements and are of quite
different interests, tastes, and values from what can be
experienced by any given individual.
In a peculiar way, this great realm is a syzygy—it consists of
basic themes—but there may be thousands of these—combined in
different ways, added to by the other modifications of culture.
What it means to feel proud of oneself as “successful” in any
given role may have components of value that partake of many
different dimensions. Our present view of a successful man or
woman in late-modern Western cultures is perhaps a small range of
all possible variations for all peoples in all eras. So both the
essential “instincts” and the resultant “forms,” the archetypes
that are given a pre-existent form by culture as archetypal
images—these are the next “step” up.
“Meta-Archetypes”
But there’s More-Yet. This could be a chant, a mystical prayer
re-directing our capacity for awe and reverence to ever-“higher”
or more essential domains. Beyond the ranges of all human forms
there are fundamental processes in nature, aside from our own
species, or any species in particular. There is the meta-archetype
of harmony, balance, equilibrium, that allows for life itself. And
this balance includes a continuing dynamic tension between too
much and too little, expansion and contraction, individuation and
underlying stability of structure, established wisdom and creative
exploration—dualities in process that give life its form.
Essential Tao
But there’s More-Yet: This great dance of becoming is itself an
expression of the dynamisms of being itself, material being in
space, the cosmos as we know it. Here are mind-stretching
dualities, syzygies, that we only describe through mystical
paradox: Yang (creative) and Yin (receptive), in and out, up and
down, the cosmic pulse of Om, vibration, yes and no, matter and
energy that occupies space-time (Yin) and mind-love that gives the
impetus to unfold in this matrix (Yang). These are also suggested
at the upper levels of the Tree of Life.
Beyond that is the Unity that integrates, combines one-ness and
separate-ness. We humans are biased in our genes to prefer life,
existence, action, differentiation, becoming, progress, learning,
and the like, but the opposites of these qualities are necessary
in order to give them contrast and certain kinds of beyond-energy.
What, after all is dynamism without its polar opposite of
stagnation? We need the latter to pause and take stock, to be
readied for a new round. Winter is needed for Spring. I can’t
explain it further—it just seems to apply to so much we live and
experience.
A Holistic Map
In a thousand years this map may be viewed as being as limited and
quaint as the way we view our early medieval maps of the world and
the universe. It’s okay. It’s not really necessary for us to get
the final, absolute answer. If we did, it might well be that we
wouldn’t know what to do with it, how to process it. It might be
as meaningless as the humorist and science-fiction author, the
late Douglas Adam’s use of the number 42 as the ultimate answer to
the meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Summary: A Bit of Theology
For me, God is not a personal king-like image—that’s a terribly
perverted form of anthropo-morphism that hardly does justice to
whatever is a trillion galaxies and all the life forms in it. My
best guess is that the “highest” includes all these and has the
pleasant enjoyment of being Everything, and always More, Yet. This
quite transcends my little brain’s capacity to imagine in its
furthers reachings, aided by science fiction writers, even.
Certainly God includes and is all of space-time as we know it, and
all dream spaces, too, all imaginations, and all experiences at
even the most sub-microscopic level. Now what could do all that?
Stretch, mind, stretch!
Okay, so what if in addition to these characteristics there is
also an internal desire to differentiate and yet integrate, to
expand in certain ways or develop? What if there are disadvantages
and costs too being in material form as an extension of Divine
action? (For example, in five billion years or more things begin
to wind down?) But, like, that’s not a problem so much as a
natural extension of the pulse of a multi-dimensional God that
does this sort of thing.
My theory is that Mind, too, participates in the All-Ness; it
makes it all far more multi-dimensionl than the mere 3 dimensions
space, one dimension of matter, and the kinds of energy operating
on matter in this system. God’s mind-body in my rudimentary
speculations is always being Re-Born into more encompassing forms
of Evolution, towards more self-awareness and correspondingly
responsible capacities. That’s part of my take on God’s will.
Another angle is that God is trying to get as much aesthetic
enjoyment out of every event—and that’s in part what consciousness
serves.
However puny or insufficient this theology may be in actuality,
it’s a goodly stretch for me, and I figure that if theological
speculations don’t stretch me, they clearly aren’t worthy (in my
book) of being considered as a useful theology.