Actually \u201cdoing\u201d rather than just \u201cthinking about\u201d helps anchor the behavior in consciousness. Through action one mixes the thought and the intention. The mind has a tendency to be flabby, to forget what it was talking about, to dissociate just enough to go off course. We have a tendency to think we know what we\u2019re doing even when we don\u2019t. For example, yesterday at a restaurant I carelessly ordered lemonade instead of water with a bit of lemon, and ended up being charged for this slip\u2014just costly enough for my guardian angel, \u201cBud,\u201d to nudge me and say \u201cwake up just a bit more.\u201d What? I thought I was awake; but I wasn\u2019t; I really didn\u2019t realize I was saying \u201clemonade.\u201d <\/p>\n
In the same sense, this is why writing is important, a technology that involves devising a writing system, making paper, writing instruments, and improving all these over hundreds or even thousands of years. Without writing, whatever goes on just while talking tends to be be too elusive. Thoughts alone, unexpressed, operate internally in the mind. There they can be too easily attacked by a host of mental dissolving processes<\/strong><\/em>: Thoughts may be dismissed as too puny. The unconscious mind, objecting to anything that might be forbidden, may be buried, repressed. This can happen if we even dare touch on forbidden topics. The mind broils with tiny (and sometimes not-so-tiny) complexes, like little parasites, who mock us, as if to say, \u201cWho do you think you are, someone who might think something worthwhile?\u201d<\/p>\n Saying the thought out loud helps; having an audience who hears you helps. It becomes an affirmation. Writing the thought down puts it out there where you can see it, return to it, re-view it. Thus, writing has been a major advance in not just technology, but also thinking. You externalize the thinking process, which makes it an object, one you can not only review, but also revise. It\u2019s out there. You can see it and return to it.<\/p>\n Playing it out as a bit of enactment further serves to anchor and objectify thoughts. You can review and revise them. Play in this sense—role play—is not frivolous so much as provisional, a type of practice. This helps you fix the point and then build around it. <\/p>\n For example, the capacity for empathy can be developed through role playing the predicament of the other. One must stay in role and be asked questions. Rare is the person who can do it by himself just on being told how. Like writing supports talking, adjunctive enactments support thinking empathically. Thus, empathy-building is better done in small role plays with a few people present to help. Minimally, perhaps, just one other and an empty chair will do the job. The person takes the role of the other and is warmed up by being asked questions by the facilitating person present.<\/p>\n There are a number of things that are best learned by doing them, from swimming to sewing. It\u2019s a matter of \u201cgetting the knack.\u201d Lectures won\u2019t cut it. That\u2019s why enactment is very variable. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Actually \u201cdoing\u201d rather than just \u201cthinking about\u201d helps anchor the behavior in consciousness. Through action one mixes the thought and the intention. The mind has a tendency to be flabby, to forget what it was talking about, to dissociate just enough to go off course. We have a tendency to think we know what we\u2019re […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,4,32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-play-and-spontaneity","category-psychodrama","category-social-depth-psychology-sociometry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1516"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1517,"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516\/revisions\/1517"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blatner.com\/adam\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}